YouTube was recently reported as having removed world cup cricket video clips after the ICC accused it of copyright infringement. In the brief report, Pavan Duggal was reported as having said that “under Section 79, IT Act, network service providers (like Google, You Tube) shall be liable for all third party data or information made available.” The statement may be a mis-quote or a mistake of law. In either event, section 79 of the IT Act actually states the exact opposite:
79. Network service providers not to be liable in certain cases. For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that no person providing any service as a network service provider shall be liable under this Act, rules or regulations made thereunder for any third party information or data made available by him if he proves that the offence or contravention was committed without his knowledge or that he had exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence or contravention.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this section,-
(a) "network service provider" means an intermediary; (b) "third party information" means any information dealt with by a network service provider in his capacity as an intermediary;
The only way that an intermediary such as YouTube can be made liable is if it is unable to prove that the offence was committed without it’s knowledge, or if it can be shown that the intermediary refused to remove the infringing materials after the infringement was brought to its notice. In YouTube’s case, since the materials were removed by YouTube, it would in all likelihood be shielded by section 79 of the IT Act.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
Posted by Mrinalini Kochupillai at 10:32 AM